Trending
Written by: Chris Carnazzo | Your Money Cues
Picture a man at the gym. Let's call him Brad. Every lift is technically perfect. His physique looks carved from stone. He carries himself with the quiet confidence of someone who never struggles. He makes everyone around him feel just a little inadequate. Most people know a Brad.
One day, Brad loads the bar for a heavy squat, grinds out the rep, racks the weight, turns around, catches his gym bag with his foot, and crashes to the floor. Before anyone even moves to help, the people who quietly resented him feel something surprising. Relief. Maybe even a flicker of satisfaction. Then Brad starts laughing at himself, and something changes. For the first time, he seems human.
Most professionals spend years building competence. They assume that if clients recognize it, trust will follow. But there is a hidden trap. The very cues that signal you know what you're doing can also create distance before you have a chance to build rapport.
It comes down to warmth and competence. The smarter you are, the easier it is to accidentally signal distance instead of trust.
Warmth and Competence
Your subconscious scans faces, voices, posture, and movement for cues about whether someone is safe, dangerous, helpful, or worth avoiding. The amygdala starts processing these signals before you're consciously aware of them. By the time you think you're making a first impression, much of that impression has already been formed.
At its core, every new interaction boils down to two questions: Can I trust this person? Can this person help me?
Psychologists Janine Willis and Alexander Todorov found that people form an impression of a face in about one-tenth of a second. Giving them more time rarely changed that first impression. It mostly made people more confident in it.
Social psychologists Susan Fiske, Amy Cuddy, and Peter Glick found that our first impressions tend to revolve around two dimensions: warmth and competence. Warmth answers one question: What are this person's intentions? Are they on my side? Competence answers another: Can this person actually help me?
The order matters. When warmth comes first, competence feels reassuring. When competence comes first, it can feel threatening.
It's a Trap!
Some professions are easy to judge. You know almost immediately whether your barber gave you a good haircut or your mechanic fixed the problem. Financial planning isn't like that. A retirement plan might not prove itself for decades. When people can't judge the quality of the work itself, they judge the person delivering it. Your cues become part of the service.1
Now add the emotional state clients bring into the room. Most already feel behind. They're confused about money, embarrassed by past decisions, afraid they should have started sooner or known more.
Then they sit across from someone who clearly has the answers. You think you're signaling credibility. They may be reading status.
The question running through the client's mind is not, "Is this person smart?"
That answer is obvious.
The real question is, "Is this smart person safe for me?"
Without warmth, competence starts to feel threatening. You become impressive in exactly the wrong way.
Blind Spot
Highly competent people rarely notice this because competence is a source of pride. The credentials on the wall, the letters after your name, the polished office, the effortless use of technical language, all feel like signs of credibility. A client who already feels intimidated sees distance.
The problem usually isn't your character. It's your cues. And that's good news, because cues are much easier to change than character.
The Four Quadrants
-
High warmth and high competence create admiration. Clients trust you, like you, and believe you can help.
-
High competence and low warmth create envy and suspicion. Clients respect you, but they never fully relax.
-
High warmth and low competence create pity. People enjoy talking with you, but they hesitate to follow your advice.
-
Low warmth and low competence create contempt. This is the danger zone.
-
The trap for smart professionals is not low competence. It is cold competence. That is Brad before the face-plant.
People sometimes feel a flicker of pleasure when a high-status, low-warmth person stumbles, because the threat suddenly feels smaller.2 Brad didn't become more competent after he fell. He became more human.
Lead With Warmth
Leading with warmth doesn't mean hiding your competence or pretending to know less. It means giving people a reason to feel safe before asking them to trust your expertise.
Research on the pratfall effect, first demonstrated by Elliot Aronson and colleagues in 1966, found that a small, genuine mistake can make an already-competent person more likable. The mistake doesn't create competence. It reveals humanity.
The lesson isn't to manufacture mistakes. It's to stop hiding every imperfection. Admit uncertainty when it's real. Pause before answering when the answer deserves care. Laugh when something small goes wrong. Let clients see the person behind the professional.
The rule is simple. Warmth first. Competence second. Not because competence matters less, but because competence without warmth can feel like power without safety.
Clients don't hire the smartest advisor they meet. They hire the smartest advisor who makes them feel safe.
Want to go deeper? I spoke with Vanessa Van Edwards, bestselling author of Cues: Master the Secret Language of Charismatic Communication, about the subtle signals financial planners send in the first few minutes of a meeting and how surprisingly small changes can transform an interaction. Click here to read the conversation.
Curious how you come across to clients? The People Skills Index from the Science of People measures how you come across on the dimensions on which this article is built, and closes the gap between how you see yourself and how others perceive you. It gives you a baseline and lets you track how practice, coaching, and experience change the way you show up over time.
Related: The Deferred Life Syndrome: When Preparing for the Future Delays Living Today
References
Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227-228. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342263
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
Van Edwards, V. (2022). Cues: Master the secret language of charismatic communication. Portfolio.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
Notes
-
Credence good: a service whose quality is hard to evaluate even after receiving it.
-
Mina Cikara and Susan Fiske have studied this pattern, finding people can feel pleasure at the misfortune of envied, high-competence and low-warmth targets.