Trending
Written by: Joel Crampton
Financial advisors already have plenty of advertising platforms to consider.
Google captures people actively searching for help. Facebook and Instagram build awareness before that search begins. LinkedIn offers professional targeting, while X can generate relatively inexpensive exposure around financial topics.
Now ChatGPT is joining the mix, and other AI platforms are close behind.
I recently helped a financial firm run a small ChatGPT advertising experiment. It didn’t generate the leads we wanted, but the results were interesting enough that I believe RIA firms should be paying attention.
What happened in our test
ChatGPT ads are small sponsored placements shown below the platform’s responses. They currently appear for users on the Free and Go plans, while users on paid plans such as Plus and Pro don’t see them.
Our client was listed as a Financial Services company and was approved. It may have slipped through the moderation process, although OpenAI’s current policies say certain U.S. financial advertisers may be approved on a case-by-case basis.
Here were the approximate results:
- $700 in total spend
- 22,000 impressions
- 0.5% click-through rate
- Roughly 110 clicks
- No attributable conversions so far
The 0.5% click-through rate was similar to what this firm had seen on Meta and X, but significantly lower than its performance on LinkedIn or Google.
Would I call it a successful lead-generation campaign? No.
But 22,000 impressions inside a relatively uncluttered advertising environment created meaningful visibility in a very crowded marketplace. For a $700 experiment, we learned quite a bit without risking much.
ChatGPT plays a different role
Each advertising platform reaches prospects in a different mindset.
Google captures active demand. Someone searches for a financial advisor, retirement planner, or help managing company stock.
Meta creates demand. Facebook and Instagram introduce a firm through educational content, videos, stories, and lead magnets.
LinkedIn provides professional context. It can work well for executives, business owners, and employees at specific companies, although the traffic usually costs more.
X offers inexpensive reach. It can be useful for market commentary and topical conversations, but attention doesn’t always translate into qualified appointments.
ChatGPT sits somewhere between awareness and intent. A user may already be asking questions about retirement, taxes, investing, or stock compensation when the ad appears. That context could eventually become extremely valuable.
The placement itself is very small, so there isn’t much room to explain a complicated financial-planning proposition. The message needs to quickly communicate:
- Who the firm helps
- What problem it solves
- Why someone should click
- One clear next step
It’s closer to a compact introduction than a traditional display ad.
ChatGPT won’t be the only AI ad platform
This is bigger than one OpenAI experiment.
Google is already testing and expanding ad formats within AI Mode and other AI-driven search experiences. Microsoft is placing ads across Copilot Search and Copilot Answers.
I’d expect platforms such as Perplexity and other AI answer engines to continue exploring their own sponsored placements and commercial models. Claude is the notable exception: Anthropic has publicly committed to keeping Claude conversations ad-free... that is until they see the revenue potential!
In other words, financial firms will eventually need to think beyond traditional search-engine marketing. Prospects are increasingly asking AI platforms questions they once typed into Google.
The advertising dollars will follow those questions.
Could advisors take an educational route?
An interesting opportunity may exist for RIA firms with legitimate financial-education platforms.
A firm could promote a learning center, financial-wellness portal, assessment, or resource built to help people understand retirement, investing, taxes, or workplace benefits. That experience may fit ChatGPT better than immediately asking someone to schedule a consultation.
A larger RIA firm is better positioned to build something substantial enough to stand on its own. It’s harder for a small firm to spin up because it requires useful content, proper disclosures, a strong user experience, and an eventual path toward becoming a client.
I wouldn’t recommend simply relabeling a financial-services company as an education business to avoid advertising restrictions. But if a firm genuinely operates an educational platform or portal, that could create a viable advertising approach.
What about high-net-worth prospects?
I agree with the argument that high-net-worth households may be less likely to use the free version of ChatGPT. Many executives, business owners, and sophisticated professionals probably pay for Plus, Pro, or another ad-free plan.
That limits the available audience for some RIA niches.
Still, it’s an assumption worth testing. Plenty of affluent people use free digital platforms, and audiences behave differently than marketers expect all the time.
ChatGPT ads may be more attractive for firms targeting local families, mass-affluent investors, people nearing retirement, or consumers early in their financial-planning journey. A firm focused exclusively on ultra-high-net-worth households may find the audience too limited.
Should financial advisors test ChatGPT ads?
I’d consider a controlled experiment for a firm that:
- Has a clearly defined audience
- Already has a strong landing page or educational resource
- Can spend $500 to $1,500 without requiring immediate ROI
- Has conversion tracking in place
- Understands that this is an experiment, not a proven lead source
I’d be less enthusiastic if every advertising dollar needs to generate appointments quickly. Google Search, retargeting and well-built Meta campaigns have longer track records and more mature optimization tools.
The firms that stay ahead aren’t necessarily the ones chasing every new platform. They’re the ones willing to run disciplined experiments, limit the downside and learn before everyone else arrives.
This $700 ChatGPT campaign didn’t produce a client (yet). It did produce 22,000 impressions, more than 100 website visits, and firsthand insight into an advertising channel that is still in its earliest stages.
That made the experiment worthwhile.
ChatGPT ads may or may not become a major source of financial-services discovery. But AI search advertising is coming, whether it happens through ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Mode, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, or platforms that haven’t yet reached scale.
RIA firms willing to learn early will have an advantage when it does.
Related: 5 Economic Trends That Can't Continue Forever—and Why Investors Should Care