THE SUPREME COURT ABORTION RULING has changed our view of the fall election. Republicans still are still likely to win control of the House, but the Senate could be winnable for the Democrats in the wake of last Friday’s court decision.
REPUBLICANS WERE JUBILANT IN PUBLIC over the court ruling, but in private they conceded that their chances of winning a landslide on Nov. 8 have diminished. Turnout is always the key, and supporters of abortion rights could turn out in huge numbers in states where Republicans are losing altitude in tight Senate races — Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, etc.
OF COURSE HIGH GASOLINE AND FOOD PRICES will be dominant issues, which is why we think the GOP will pick up more than the five seats required to take the House. But the GOP’s hopes of a 25 or 30 seat gain now looks less likely. Something like a 15-to-20 seat House pickup seems more realistic.
THAT’S BECAUSE A CLEAR MAJORITY of Americans favor some abortion rights, and a very large majority opposes banning abortion for victims of rape or incest. If Republicans defend that stance, they could put the Senate back in play. A one-seat pickup for the Democrats, giving them a 51-49 majority, is plausible.
MANY REPUBLICANS REFUSED to speak to reporters after the ruling, because Justice Clarence Thomas raised the explosive issue of what comes next — state curbs on abortion pills is at the top of the list. These pills account for about half of all abortions in the U.S.
A WEEK AGO, Louisiana’s governor signed into law a bill that outlawed out-of-state providers from mailing abortion pills, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a $75,000 fine. New curbs on crossing state borders to get an abortion also may be enacted.
THOMAS AND HIS ALLIES may overplay their hand — especially if the abortion issue morphs into a debate over gay marriage and the use of contraceptives. Most Republicans will shun any talk about these two issues, but Democrats will relentlessly warn about what Thomas will do next.
WHILE DEMOCRATS TOLD US OVER THE WEEKEND that this is an issue that could drive voter turnout, they also grumbled that Joe Biden hasn’t been assertive enough; more than one source told us that this could finally provide Kamala Harris with a marquee issue. At the least, she will vigorously lobby businesses to offer reproductive benefits.
AS FOR MORE RADICAL APPROACHES, we did not detect much support for expanding the Supreme Court, codifying Roe v. Wade, or impeaching justices like Brett Kavanaugh for alleged perjury when he asserted at his confirmation hearing that Roe v. Wade was “settled law.”
SOME PRO-CHOICE ADVOCATES want to press ahead on these issues, especially codifying Roe v. Wade, but they don’t have the votes in the Senate, unless there’s a change in the filibuster rule that requires 60 votes to cut off debate. Many Democrats are angry that Biden won’t cross that line.
FOR THE MARKETS THIS MORNING, there’s some hope that the Federal Reserve may not have to raise interest rates super-aggressively, as it pledged, if the economy and inflation are beginning to cool off this summer, which now seems possible. That would be good news.
WHAT ISN’T GOOD NEWS is that still another enormously divisive political issue will persist for years to come. There will be two Americas, geographically and politically, with no hope of compromise on abortion.
Related: Donald Trump’s Disastrous June
The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of AGF, its subsidiaries or any of its affiliated companies, funds or investment strategies.
The views expressed in this blog are provided as a general source of information based on information available as of the date of publication and should not be considered as personal investment advice or an offer or solicitation to buy and/or sell securities. Speculation or stated believes about future events, such as market or economic conditions, company or security performance, or other projections represent the beliefs of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of AGF, its subsidiaries or any of its affiliated companies, funds or investment strategies. Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy in these commentaries at the time of publication; however, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Market conditions may change and AGF accepts no responsibility for individual investment decisions arising from the use of or reliance on the information contained herein. Any financial projections are based on the opinions of the author and should not be considered as a forecast. The forward looking statements and opinions may be affected by changing economic circumstances and are subject to a number of uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward looking statements. The information contained in this commentary is designed to provide you with general information related to the political and economic environment in the United States. It is not intended to be comprehensive investment advice applicable to the circumstances of the individual.
AGF Investments is a group of wholly owned subsidiaries of AGF Management Limited, a Canadian reporting issuer. The subsidiaries included in AGF Investments are AGF Investments Inc. (AGFI), AGF Investments America Inc. (AGFA), AGF Investments LLC (AGFUS) and AGF International Advisors Company Limited (AGFIA). AGFA and AGFUS are registered advisors in the U.S. AGFI is a registered as a portfolio manager across Canadian securities commissions. AGFIA is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and registered with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission. The subsidiaries that form AGF Investments manage a variety of mandates comprised of equity, fixed income and balanced assets.