Trending
Investors have access to more information than at any point in history. Market forecasts, sentiment indicators, valuation measures, economic data, analyst opinions, podcasts, financial news, and social media are available almost instantly. You might assume that all this information would lead to better investment decisions.
Often, it does the opposite. The problem isn’t necessarily that investors have too little information. It’s that they have just enough information to become confident in a conclusion. They find a compelling chart, a respected strategist, or a persuasive data point and believe they’ve done their homework. For financial advisors, this creates an important opportunity. Our value isn’t simply giving clients more information. It’s helping them understand which information matters, what it actually tells us, and whether it should affect their financial decisions.
The Problem With “Doing Your Research”
Bank of America’s Bull & Bear Indicator recently reached 9.7. Readings above 8 are considered extremely bullish and are often interpreted as a contrarian signal.
An investor seeing that number could easily reach a conclusion:
Investors are too bullish. Markets are expensive. A correction must be coming.
It sounds reasonable. There is data behind it. It comes from a respected institution.
But then look elsewhere…
The AAII Investor Sentiment Survey has recently shown more bearish investors than bullish investors. Consumer sentiment measures have also reflected considerable pessimism.
So which is it?
Are investors extremely bullish or bearish?
Potentially both.
That’s because different indicators measure different things. The Bank of America indicator incorporates positioning and market activity, while surveys such as AAII are attempting to capture how investors feel.
And what people do isn’t always consistent with how they feel.
That distinction matters.
Feelings and Behavior Don’t Always Agree
One of the mistakes we make when interpreting investor behavior is assuming attitudes and actions must line up.
They don’t.
An investor can believe the market is overvalued and continue buying stocks. Someone can be pessimistic about the economy while continuing to spend money. A retiree can say she is uncomfortable with market risk while maintaining an aggressive portfolio.
Human beings are remarkably capable of holding conflicting beliefs and behaviors at the same time.
This is why a single sentiment measure rarely tells the entire story.
It’s also why advisors should be careful when clients arrive with statements such as:
- “Everyone is bullish.”
- “Investors are terrified right now.”
- “The market is clearly overvalued.”
- “The economy is getting worse.”
The first question shouldn’t necessarily be whether the statement is correct.
A better question is:
What information led you to that conclusion?
That question gives you an opportunity to understand the client’s thought process before discussing the investment implications.
The Confirmation Bias Trap
There’s another behavioral problem hiding underneath investor research: confirmation bias.
We naturally give greater weight to information supporting what we already believe.
Imagine a client who thinks the market is due for a significant decline. They search for information about current market conditions.
They find:
- high valuations
- bullish investor positioning
- geopolitical uncertainty
- recession forecasts
- warnings from respected investors
At some point, the research stops being an investigation and becomes evidence gathering.
The client isn’t asking:
What is happening?
They’re unconsciously asking:
What evidence can I find that proves I’m right?
And because today’s information environment contains virtually every possible opinion, finding supporting evidence is incredibly easy.
A bullish investor can find convincing bullish research.
A bearish investor can find convincing bearish research.
Both can spend hours researching and emerge more confident than when they started.
That’s one reason more information doesn’t necessarily produce better decisions.
Sometimes it simply produces stronger convictions.
Advisors Shouldn’t Compete With Information
This has an important implication for how we communicate our value as financial advisors.
We aren’t going to win an information competition.
Your client can access market commentary from Wall Street firms, economists, portfolio managers, financial television, YouTube, podcasts, newsletters, AI tools, and thousands of other sources.
Trying to provide more information isn’t the answer.
The greater opportunity is helping clients filter information.
When a client sends you an article predicting a recession or a market decline, there is often little value in immediately sending three articles arguing the opposite.
That can simply turn the conversation into a battle over whose evidence is better.
Instead, help the client put the information into context.
You might ask:
- What does this information actually tell us?
- What might it be missing?
- Is there credible information pointing toward a different conclusion?
And perhaps most importantly:
- If this forecast is correct, should it actually change your financial plan or investment strategy?
That last question moves the conversation away from prediction and toward decision-making.
From Information Provider to Decision Guide
This is where behavioral finance can meaningfully change the advisor-client relationship.
Clients don’t need someone who simply knows more market facts than they do.
They need someone who can help them make better decisions when the facts are confusing, incomplete, or contradictory.
That means helping clients separate the signal from the noise, and feelings from facts.
Not every economic statistic deserves a portfolio response and an investor’s anxiety may be very real without necessarily being useful information about future market returns.
They also need to understand the difference of forecasts from decisions, and information from relevance.
Something can be possible without requiring action and even accurate information may have little bearing on a client’s long-term financial strategy.
That is a very different role than simply managing investments.
It’s also much harder for technology or an endless stream of financial content to replace.
A Simple Application for Your Next Client Conversation
The next time a client brings you a market prediction, economic article, or alarming statistic, resist the temptation to immediately tell them why it is right or wrong.
Instead, slow down the decision process.
Ask three questions:
- What about this information caught your attention?
- What information might lead us to a different conclusion?
- Does this change anything about your goals, time horizon, or financial plan?
Those questions accomplish something important.
They shift the client’s attention away from “What is the market going to do?” and toward “What should I do?”
Those are very different questions.
We can’t reliably answer the first.
But helping clients answer the second is one of the most valuable things a financial advisor can do.
The world doesn’t suffer from a shortage of financial information. Your clients can find more of it before breakfast than investors once encountered in an entire month.
What they need is perspective.
The advisor of increasing value isn’t the person who gives clients more information. It’s the person who helps them make better decisions with the information they already have.