Trending
Every sales team I talk to right now is experimenting with AI as a sales assistant. Drafting emails, prepping for calls, role-playing objections, summarizing meetings. It's a genuinely useful tool, and if you're not using it yet, you're behind.
But here's what I keep seeing: sellers ask AI to "help me sound more consultative" and get back something that sounds like a sales training manual from 2009. Generic discovery questions. Vague value props. The kind of language that makes an advisor's eyes glaze over because they've heard it a thousand times.
The problem isn't the AI. The problem is what the AI was trained on.
The Internet Is Not a Consultative Seller
AI models learn from the internet. The internet is, by volume, mostly noise. Recycled sales scripts, SEO-driven listicles, LinkedIn "thought leadership" that says nothing, decades of pitch-first, push-based selling content. That's the water AI swims in.
So when you ask it to "be consultative," your LLM reaches for the most statistically common version of that idea floating around online, which is usually shallow and generic and exactly what you're trying to rise above.
This isn't a knock on the technology. It's just how it works. AI reflects the average of what's out there. And the average of what's out there on sales is not good.
That means the quality of what you get out of AI is capped by the quality of what you put in. More specifically, it's capped by how well you understand consultative selling before you ever open the prompt window. If you don't know what good discovery sounds like, you won't recognize that AI just gave you bad discovery questions. If you don't know what it means to anchor value to a specific advisor's situation, you won't notice that AI handed you a generic value statement dressed up in confident language.
AI can execute. It can draft and summarize and accelerate. But it can't supply the judgment, the listening instinct, the read-the-room acumen that makes consultative selling actually work. That part is still on you. AI is the engine; you're the driver. Right now, most sellers are handing the keys to an engine that's never actually been taught to drive well, then wondering why they end up in the ditch.
If you want AI to make you better, not just faster, here's how to put that into practice.
Get Genuinely Smart on Consultative Selling
Before you can direct AI, you need a real, working knowledge of what consultative selling actually is, not the buzzword version. That means understanding the difference between a question that gathers information and a question that builds insight. It means knowing what it looks like to diagnose a problem before you prescribe a solution. It means recognizing when you're pitching versus when you're actually consulting.
This is a "you" problem before it's an "AI" problem. Read the people who've actually studied this, not just sales motivational content, but the research on what separates top consultative performers from everyone else. The sharper your own model of consultative selling, the easier it becomes to spot when AI is giving you the cliché version instead of the real thing.
Write Down How You Express It
Here's an exercise worth doing: sit down and actually write out how you personally show up as consultative in your conversations with advisors. Not in theory, in practice. What questions do you ask that advisors tell you they don't get from other wholesalers? What's the moment in a call where you stop selling and start solving? What does it sound like when you anchor a recommendation to something specific an advisor told you, rather than a generic feature of your product?
This isn't busywork. When you articulate your own consultative instincts in plain language, you create a personal model, almost a private playbook, that you can hand to AI as context. Instead of asking AI to invent consultative behavior from internet averages, you're asking it to build on your demonstrated approach. That's the difference between AI guessing and AI assisting.
Stop Asking AI to "Be Consultative." Ask for the Behaviors.
This is the most important shift. "Make this email more consultative" is a vague instruction, and vague instructions get vague, cliché output. Instead, ask for the specific behaviors that consultative selling is actually built from. A few examples:
"Give me follow-up questions that would get this advisor to tell me more about why their current allocation isn't working."
"Write a value statement that connects directly to the concern this advisor raised about client retention, not a generic product benefit."
"What's a deeper diagnostic question I could ask here that goes past the surface-level need they mentioned?"
When you name the specific mechanic, whether it's deeper questioning, follow-up that invites elaboration, or value anchored to a stated need, you give AI something concrete to execute against. You're not asking it to be wise. You're asking it to perform a specific, well-defined skill, and then you're applying your own judgment to evaluate and refine what comes back.
The Real Takeaway
AI doesn't replace consultative acumen. It amplifies whatever acumen you bring to it. Sellers who skip the work of actually understanding and practicing consultative selling will keep getting the internet's average: competent-sounding, forgettable, indistinguishable from every other AI-assisted pitch landing in an advisor's inbox this week.
The sellers who do the work will be the ones who use AI to create real signal in a market that's about to get a lot noisier. They'll be the ones who get sharp on the principles, who can articulate their own consultative instincts, and who know how to direct AI toward specific behaviors instead of vague outcomes.
The tool got smarter. The bar for the seller just got higher too.
Related: Wholesalers Earn Second Meetings by Changing First-Meeting Signals