Cryptocurrency and the Private Foundation Minimum Distribution Requirement

Written By: Jeffrey D. Haskell and Jennifer E. Bruckman | Foundation Source

Monthly valuation could make a big difference

As time goes by, the notion of cryptocurrency—utilizing cryptography to validate, secure, and digitally record transactions on a distributed ledger—is becoming increasingly accepted and embraced. Over the last several years, investor interest in cryptocurrency has exploded despite its notorious volatility, as evidenced by the fact that there are currently over 5,000 cryptocurrencies in circulation with a total global market capitalization of more than $1.59 trillion 1. In fact, the total market capitalization has increased by nearly 570% over the past twelve months alone 2.

This increased interest has carried over into the world of philanthropy as well, where donors are making tax advantaged contributions of highly appreciated cryptocurrency. It is becoming increasingly common for charitable organizations, including private foundations (PFs), to retain such contributions as part of their portfolios, rather than reflexively liquidating them. As a result, it’s important that private foundations in particular consider the compliance implications 3 that can be triggered by holding such non-traditional investments.

Property vs. Currency Tax Treatment

While the IRS has taken the position that cryptocurrency is property rather than currency, it hasn’t issued comprehensive guidance on the tax treatment of cryptocurrency, leaving a number of open compliance questions. One of the IRS’ guidance gaps becomes evident when a PF holds cryptocurrency as an investment and needs to calculate the value of that asset for purposes of determining its annual five percent minimum distribution requirement (MDR) 4. Generally, a PF’s MDR for a given year is based on the value of the preceding year’s investment assets as set forth in the regulations.

The regulations provide the methodologies for valuing cash, publicly traded securities, and other assets. Cash is valued by averaging the cash balances on the first and last days of each month in the PF’s tax year. Similarly, publicly traded securities are valued by averaging the monthly values of such securities on a consistent basis, such as referencing the values as of the same day of each month throughout the year. Other assets must be valued annually on the same date each year, except real estate in certain cases. Since the IRS has taken the position that cryptocurrency is property, not cash, and has not classified it as a publicly traded security, a strict reading of the regulations would require that cryptocurrency be valued only once per year. However, note that legislative history frames the MDR as a percentage of the average of the PF’s noncharitable assets 5. Where asset values are easily ascertainable (as is the case for cash and publicly traded securities), the preference is to value such assets on a monthly basis, while other, less easily valued assets should be valued as frequently as may be appropriate 6 .

Extremes of Annual Valuation

As we noted earlier, cryptocurrency is known for potentially extreme volatility in terms of short-term price swings. If cryptocurrency is valued only once per year, the impact on the following year’s MDR can be extreme. For instance, if the value of the cryptocurrency plummeted on the annual valuation date, the PF’s MDR for the next year would be artificially low—even if the value of the cryptocurrency bounces back the next day. As an example, if the value of cryptocurrency held on the valuation date drops to $1 million from the previous month’s high of $5 million, the portion of the PF’s MDR attributable to such cryptocurrency would be only $50,000 (5% x $1 million).

On the other hand, if the cryptocurrency’s value skyrocketed on the valuation date, the PF’s MDR for the next year would be artificially high. For instance, if the cryptocurrency held on that date skyrockets from $1 million to $5 million, the PF’s MDR attributable to such cryptocurrency would be $250,000 (5% x $5 million). If the PF lacks sufficient other liquid assets, it may be forced to sell its cryptocurrency at a loss to satisfy the increased MDR rather than hold it and wait for it to increase in value once again. Even more concerning is that the artificially increased MDR would be disproportionately larger than the usual five percent of assets, such that the satisfaction of its MDR would result in a significant reduction in the foundation’s total assets—that’s if it even has sufficient liquid assets to satisfy the inflated MDR in the first place. Many PFs found themselves in a similar situation after the market crash of 2008 because their MDR for that year had been based on a much higher prior year asset level.

Benefits of Monthly Valuation

If cryptocurrency could be treated like publicly traded securities for purposes of calculating the MDR, then averaging the monthly values should even out the peaks and valleys of any extreme price swings over the course of the tax year, resulting in an MDR that is more reflective of the cryptocurrency’s value. As noted earlier, the IRS has not taken the position that cryptocurrency that is publicly traded on one or more exchanges should be classified as a publicly traded security. However, for the limited purpose of calculating the MDR, the regulations governing the calculation of the MDR arguably provide a reasonable basis for treating cryptocurrency as a publicly traded security.

Specifically, Treasury Regulation Section 53.4942-2(c)(4)(i) provides that securities must be valued on a monthly basis if market quotations for such securities are readily available. Section 53.4942-2(c)(4)(v) provides that the term “securities” in this context “includes, but is not limited to, common and preferred stocks, bonds, and mutual fund shares.” (emphasis added) Although cryptocurrency may not fit the mold of a traditional security, the regulations’ definition of a security for this purpose is arguably expansive enough to encompass cryptocurrency.

If cryptocurrency can be treated as a publicly traded security, it would be valued on a monthly basis only if market quotations are readily available. Per Treasury Regulation Section 53.4942-2(c)(4)(i), market quotations are readily available if a security is:

Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange, or any city or regional exchange in which quotations appear on a daily basis, including foreign securities listed on a recognized foreign national or regional exchange;

Regularly traded in the national or regional over-the-counter market, for which published quotations are available;

or Locally traded, for which quotations can readily be obtained from established brokerage firms.

Thus, the regulations seem to focus on the regularity of trading, frequency of valuations, and—in alignment with the legislative history—ease of obtaining quotations. Many cryptocurrencies meet all of these requirements, as they are traded on exchanges where quotations are readily available. In fact, at least one site7 aggregates the pricing data for popular cryptocurrencies from multiple exchanges in U.S. dollars on a continuous basis, which is useful because a given cryptocurrency may be traded on multiple exchanges contemporaneously.

In conclusion, solely for purposes of calculating the MDR, cryptocurrencies should be valued monthly like publicly traded securities, provided that they are regularly traded on exchanges where market quotations are readily available in U.S. dollars. This approach, applied consistently, should prejudice neither the IRS’ nor the PF’s interests in terms of the MDR, and it will not impact a PF’s tax liability. If anything, this is a more even-handed and accurate metric for valuing such a volatile asset over the course of a year. We believe this approach is both in accordance with the spirit of the regulations and arguably the letter of the regulations as well.

Jeffrey D. Haskell, J.D., LL.M., is chief legal officer and Jennifer E. Bruckman is deputy legal officer for Foundation Source, which provides comprehensive support services for private foundations. The firm works in partnership with financial and legal advisors as well as directly with individuals and families.

Related: Helping Families Make the Most of Their Philanthropy

1 As of June 9, 2021 per
2 See
3 A number of IRC Chapter 42 compliance issues present themselves in connection with cryptocurrency, such as the potential for a jeopardizing investment under IRC Section 4944 when a PF purchases cryptocurrency and state-level prudent investor rule concerns, although such concerns are beyond the scope of this article.
4 For purposes of this article the term “MDR” means the amount of qualifying distributions that must be made by the end of the present tax year to avoid a violation and 30% underdistribution penalty. Technically, the MDR represents the prior tax year’s “undistributed income.”
5 See House Committee Report, No. 91-413, Tax Reform Act of 1969 (Pgs. 1669-70).
6 Id.
7 See