The Flaw in Biden’s Budget Proposal: How to Pay for It

THE STUNNING RISE IN GOVERNMENT SPENDING in President Biden’s new budget raises this crucial issue: how — or whether — it can be paid for.

IT WILL TAKE SEVERAL MONTHS for details of the new budget to get ironed out; this morning’s proposal is simply a rough outline. Talks on an infrastructure compromise may be fruitful by mid-summer, but a second package of social spending could stall.

WE WON’T GET INTO ALL THE DETAILS this morning — the details will change — but the issue that demands closer scrutiny is how deficits of well over $1 trillion per year through 2031 can be paid for (Biden’s budget doesn’t even include sweeping new health care proposals that will be introduced later this year).

THE ANSWER, SIMPLY, is that these deficits will not be paid for. It’s as if the Modern Monetary Theory has prevailed — deficits don’t really matter, right? Let’s look at options for paying for this explosion of spending, as red ink easily hits 120% of the total economy within a decade:

HIGHER TAXES? President Biden’s proposals will encounter fierce resistance from every Republican in the Senate, the business community, and a handful of moderate Democrats like Joe Manchin, who appears to be aligning with Republicans who want absolutely no new taxes.

THIS REINFORCES OUR FORECAST that tax hikes — if any — will be modest. The top rate for capital gains won’t come anywhere close to the rate on ordinary income; corporate taxes may rise slightly, estate taxes might not get touched. Actually, the big tax issue will be whether to extend many provisions in Donald Trump’s 2017 tax bill, which are set to sunset in 2026. The cost of this is not included in Biden’s proposal.

SPENDING CUTS? No chance. Spending will continue to soar to nearly 25% of GDP, the highest level since the end of World War II. Even defense spending, which progressives had hoped to cut, will rise by at least the level of inflation.

STRONGER ECONOMIC GROWTH? To his credit, Biden didn’t try to sugar-coat deficits by predicting unrealistic economic growth. He’s at about 2-1/4 percent GDP growth for the next decade, which is do-able — but not strong enough to make a major dent in the deficit.

BOTTOM LINE: The Biden budget relies on a very shaky premise — debt servicing costs can be accommodated. In the short run, ultra-low interest rates will keep servicing costs tolerable, but later in the decade — as the population ages and pressure increases on Social Security and Medicare — total debt will exceed $30 trillion.

THUS IT APPEARS THAT THE ONLY WAY this spending binge can be accommodated is if interest rates stay unusually low. Biden has a Fed Chairman who’s willing to “go big,” but as the unemployment rate plunges to nearly 4% next year (as the Biden budget projects), the issue may not be whether the Fed will keep rates low — will the markets keep rates low?

THAT’S THE FLAW IN BIDEN’S BUDGET: If the Fed allows the economy to overheat and spending continues to surge, interest rates inevitably will have to rise; the issue is whether they will rise moderately or rise dramatically.

Related: Joe Biden’s Agenda is in Trouble

The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of AGF, its subsidiaries or any of its affiliated companies, funds or investment strategies.

The views expressed in this blog are provided as a general source of information based on information available as of the date of publication and should not be considered as personal investment advice or an offer or solicitation to buy and/or sell securities. Speculation or stated believes about future events, such as market or economic conditions, company or security performance, or other projections represent the beliefs of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of AGF, its subsidiaries or any of its affiliated companies, funds or investment strategies. Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy in these commentaries at the time of publication; however, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Market conditions may change and AGF accepts no responsibility for individual investment decisions arising from the use of or reliance on the information contained herein. Any financial projections are based on the opinions of the author and should not be considered as a forecast. The forward looking statements and opinions may be affected by changing economic circumstances and are subject to a number of uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward looking statements. The information contained in this commentary is designed to provide you with general information related to the political and economic environment in the United States. It is not intended to be comprehensive investment advice applicable to the circumstances of the individual.

AGF Investments is a group of wholly owned subsidiaries of AGF Management Limited, a Canadian reporting issuer. The subsidiaries included in AGF Investments are AGF Investments Inc. (AGFI), AGF Investments America Inc. (AGFA), AGF Investments LLC (AGFUS) and AGF International Advisors Company Limited (AGFIA). AGFA and AGFUS are registered advisors in the U.S. AGFI is a registered as a portfolio manager across Canadian securities commissions. AGFIA is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and registered with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission. The subsidiaries that form AGF Investments manage a variety of mandates comprised of equity, fixed income and balanced assets.