At 63, on the verge of retirement, I find myself grappling with a troubling realization that challenges a lifetime of principles. The old adage "nice guys finish last" – which I've spent decades fighting against – seems to be proving itself true in ways that deeply concern me about the direction our society is heading.
A Lifetime of Fighting the Stereotype
For most of my career, I refused to accept that kindness and civility were incompatible with success. I believed that treating others with respect, being patient and understanding, and approaching conflicts with grace would ultimately be rewarded. This wasn't naive optimism – it was a conscious choice to model the behavior I wanted to see in the world. Through decades of professional and personal interactions, I maintained this approach, convinced that integrity and kindness would prevail.
But as I prepare to step away from active professional life, I'm forced to confront an uncomfortable truth: the world seems increasingly designed to reward the pushy, the demanding, and the aggressive, while penalizing those who operate with courtesy and patience.
The Healthcare Wake-Up Call
The first crack in my worldview came in 1998 during a frightening experience with my pregnant wife. She was losing weight and experiencing concerning symptoms, yet despite multiple calls to her doctor's office, she received only phone consultations. When I finally pressed for an explanation about why she wasn't being seen in person, the doctor's response was both shocking and illuminating: "She wasn't demanding enough."
This statement hit me like a physical blow. What did this mean for people who were naturally polite, who trusted the system, who didn't feel comfortable being pushy? The doctor's answer was brutally simple: "You have to be demanding. Otherwise, you don't get service."
At the time, I dismissed this as an isolated incident, an unfortunate anomaly in an otherwise functional system. I was wrong.
The Pattern Emerges
Years later, the pattern has become undeniable. Just yesterday, while watching "Designated Survivor," a character's frustrated observation resonated deeply: "This is what you get for being honest in Washington, D.C." The line struck me because it perfectly encapsulated what I've been witnessing with increasing frequency – a system that seems to punish honesty, patience, and civility.
This morning brought yet another example. My son went to a PNC branch to obtain a medallion signature for a trust document needed for his school fees. On Friday, they told him only the branch manager could handle it and to return Monday. When he returned Monday, the branch manager claimed the document needed notarization, not a medallion signature – despite the mutual fund explicitly requiring a medallion signature.
The resolution came only when my son, following my frustrated advice, pushed back and pointed out the contradiction. Suddenly, the "impossible" became possible. The medallion signature was provided, and the excuse about needing notarization evaporated. The difference? Pressure. Pushback. A willingness to be demanding rather than accepting.
The Systematic Breakdown
These aren't isolated incidents – they represent a broader systemic failure where basic service and fairness are no longer default expectations but prizes to be won through aggression. We've created a culture where the squeaky wheel doesn't just get the grease; it's the only wheel that gets any attention at all.
This shift has profound implications. When institutions – whether healthcare systems, banks, or government agencies – operate under the assumption that only demanding customers deserve proper service, they effectively punish civility and reward aggression. The quiet, polite, and trusting individuals get overlooked, dismissed, or inadequately served.
The Societal Cost
If we continue down this path, what happens to our social fabric? When "nice guys finish last" becomes accepted wisdom rather than a cynical observation to be challenged, we risk creating a society where kindness is seen as weakness and civility as foolishness.
The implications extend far beyond individual interactions. Children watching these dynamics learn that getting ahead requires pushing others aside. Professionals conclude that collaboration and respect are luxuries they can't afford. Communities lose the social cohesion that comes from mutual respect and consideration.
The Dilemma of Adaptation
As I approach retirement, I face a personal crossroads. Do I maintain my commitment to civility, knowing it may increasingly disadvantage me? Or do I adapt to this new reality, becoming one more voice demanding rather than requesting, pushing rather than asking politely?
The answer isn't simple. While I refuse to abandon my principles entirely, I've learned the painful lesson that sometimes advocacy requires a firmer voice. The challenge is finding a middle ground – being assertive enough to receive fair treatment while maintaining the dignity and respect that should characterize human interactions.
A Call for Reflection
The question that haunts me as I contemplate this shift is: what kind of world are we creating? If courtesy becomes a liability and aggression a necessity, we risk losing something fundamental about human interaction. The very qualities that bind communities together – patience, understanding, mutual respect – become disadvantages in a system that rewards only the loudest voices.
Perhaps the real challenge isn't accepting that "nice guys finish last," but working to create systems where finishing first doesn't require abandoning basic human decency. Until then, we all face the uncomfortable choice between our principles and our practical needs – a choice that no civilized society should force its citizens to make.
Related: The Real Problem With Communication? We Measure It Backwards
