Written by: Marin Katusa
I came up with Financially Transmitted Disease, or FTDTM for short, a couple of years ago.
It all happened when I was having dinner with some colleagues discussing quantitative easing (QE) and negative interest rate policy (NIRP).
I rarely rant about economic policy, but NIRP has massive implications to the resource world for which I want to position our portfolio.
Almost all economists and market pundits believe NIRP will be a short-lived phenomenon. However, I have a very different take.
Negative interest rate policy changes the law of economics.
I also believe that NIRP will not only go much lower than almost everyone expects, but also that it will be with us globally. Across the board. For much longer than we can imagine.
First, let me explain why NIRP will go lower and stick around for a much longer time than anyone expects.
The general perception of NIRP, using a bond at a -0.5% interest rate, for example, means that if I buy that bond, I will get back less money in the future.
But, the reason why it’s working is the unit cost of the bond is rising significantly. This means the investor who is getting a negative interest rate, is making up for it on the bond price of the unit.
Examples of Financially Transmitted Diseases
The bond market is many times the size of the stock market.
The price of Austria’s 50-year bond has gone up 28% year-to-date and 8.8% in August alone. All the while, the yield is -0.02% after taxes. That is an incredible return for the bond market unit.
From the perspective of a bond manager, he is aware he is taking the loss on the yield. But, he’s making a 28% gain on the unit price.
This makes for a score rarely ever seen in the bond market.
The “sellers’ of these bonds are aware that the bond managers made 28% YTD on a -0.02% yield. So, they will do what the market always does and push the boundaries of logic.
It’s just a matter of time before a bond is -1%.
And then the gain won’t be 28% on the unit, but 15% (or whatever the market interprets). And the yield will continue lower as bond managers now chase gains, not yield.
Bonds will soon be trading like stocks
At this point, you will ask yourself…Who the hell in their right mind would invest in a negative-yielding bond to “hope” for a gain in the unit price of the bond?
Lots of bond managers.
Because they have to place that capital somewhere.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think this even a remotely viable strategy. This will eventually take us down a rabbit hole where everything implodes. I do believe the bond market is pricing this all in. And will eventually be bailed out by the government via some form of debt jubilee.
NIRP will have the biggest impact on our global markets moving forward.
I believe this is a monetary policy stance that major central banks like the European Central Bank, most global Central banks in emerging markets and even the People’s Bank of China are going to take. This form of monetary policy is going to fuel a bonanza of ultra-cheap money. Just take a fresh look at the countries that have negative rates in the table below…
I rarely rant about economic policy, but NIRP has massive implications to the resource world for which I want to position our portfolio.
Almost all economists and market pundits believe NIRP will be a short-lived phenomenon. However, I have a very different take.
Negative interest rate policy changes the law of economics.
I also believe that NIRP will not only go much lower than almost everyone expects, but also that it will be with us globally. Across the board. For much longer than we can imagine.
First, let me explain why NIRP will go lower and stick around for a much longer time than anyone expects.
The general perception of NIRP, using a bond at a -0.5% interest rate, for example, means that if I buy that bond, I will get back less money in the future.
But, the reason why it’s working is the unit cost of the bond is rising significantly. This means the investor who is getting a negative interest rate, is making up for it on the bond price of the unit.
Examples of Financially Transmitted Diseases
The bond market is many times the size of the stock market.
The price of Austria’s 50-year bond has gone up 28% year-to-date and 8.8% in August alone. All the while, the yield is -0.02% after taxes. That is an incredible return for the bond market unit.
From the perspective of a bond manager, he is aware he is taking the loss on the yield. But, he’s making a 28% gain on the unit price.
This makes for a score rarely ever seen in the bond market.
The “sellers’ of these bonds are aware that the bond managers made 28% YTD on a -0.02% yield. So, they will do what the market always does and push the boundaries of logic.
It’s just a matter of time before a bond is -1%.
And then the gain won’t be 28% on the unit, but 15% (or whatever the market interprets). And the yield will continue lower as bond managers now chase gains, not yield.
Bonds will soon be trading like stocks
At this point, you will ask yourself…Who the hell in their right mind would invest in a negative-yielding bond to “hope” for a gain in the unit price of the bond?
Lots of bond managers.
Because they have to place that capital somewhere.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think this even a remotely viable strategy. This will eventually take us down a rabbit hole where everything implodes. I do believe the bond market is pricing this all in. And will eventually be bailed out by the government via some form of debt jubilee.
